Kybernetika 52 no. 5, 724-734, 2016

On admissibility of linear estimators in models with finitely generated parameter space

Ewa Synówka-Bejenka and Stefan ZontekDOI: 10.14736/kyb-2016-5-0724

Abstract:

The paper refers to the research on the characterization of admissible estimators initiated by Cohen \cite{Cohen}. In our paper it is proved that for linear models with finitely generated parameter space the limit of a sequence of the unique locally best linear estimators is admissible. This result is used to give a characterization of admissible linear estimators of fixed and random effects in a random linear model for spatially located sensors measuring intensity of a source of signals in discrete instants of time.

Keywords:

admissibility, linear model, linear estimation, linear prediction, admissibility among an affine set, locally best estimator

Classification:

62F10, 62J10

References:

  1. J. K. Baksalary and A. Markiewicz: Admissible linear estimators in the general Gauss-Markov model. J. Statist. Plann. Inference 19 (1988), 349-359.   DOI:10.1016/0378-3758(88)90042-0
  2. A. Cohen: All admissible estimates of the mean vector. Ann. Math. Statist. 37 (1966), 458-463.   DOI:10.1214/aoms/1177699528
  3. S. Gnot and J. Kleffe: Quadratic estimation in mixed linear models with two variance components. J. Statist. Plann. Inference 8 (1983), 267-279.   DOI:10.1016/0378-3758(83)90045-9
  4. S. Gnot, E. Rafajłowicz and A. Urbańska-Motyka: Statistical inference in linear model for spatially located sensors and random inputs. Ann. Inst. Statist Math. 53 (2001), 370-379.   DOI:10.1023/a:1012426923971
  5. A. S. Goldberger: Best linear unbiased prediction in the generalized linear regression model. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 57 (1962), 369-375.   DOI:10.1080/01621459.1962.10480665
  6. J. Gro{\ss} and A. Markiewicz: Characterization of admissible linear estimators in the linear model. Linear Algebra Appl. 388 (2004), 239-248.   DOI:10.1016/s0024-3795(03)00459-2
  7. D. A. Harville: Extension of the Gauss-Markov theorem to include the estimation of random effects. Ann. Statist. 2 (1976), 384-395.   DOI:10.1214/aos/1176343414
  8. C. R. Henderson: Estimation of genetic parameters (abstract). Ann. Math. Statist. 21 (1950), 309-310.   CrossRef
  9. C. R. Henderson: Selection index and expected genetic advance. In: Statistical Genetics and Plant Breeding (W. D. Hanson and H. F. Robinson, eds.), NAS-NRC 982, Washington 1963, pp. 141-163.   CrossRef
  10. J. Jiang: A derivation of BLUP-Best linear unbiased predictor. Statist. Probab. Lett. 32 (1997), 321-324.   DOI:10.1016/s0167-7152(96)00089-2
  11. W. Klonecki and S. Zontek: On the structure of admissible linear estimators. J. Multivariate Anal. 24 (1988), 11-30.   DOI:10.1016/0047-259x(88)90098-x
  12. L. R. LaMotte: Admissibility in linear estimation. Ann. Statist. 10 (1982), 245-255.   DOI:10.1214/aos/1176345707
  13. L. R. LaMotte: On limits of uniquely best linear estimators. Metrika 45 (1997), 197-211.   DOI:10.1007/bf02717103
  14. X. Q. Liu, J. Y. Rong and X. Y. Liu: Best linear unbiased prediction for linear combinations in general mixed linear models. J. Multivariate Anal. 99 (2008), 1503-1517.   DOI:10.1016/j.jmva.2008.01.004
  15. A. Olsen, J. Seely and D. Birkes: Invariant quadratic unbiased estimation for two variance components. Ann. Statist. 4 (1976), 878-890.   DOI:10.1214/aos/1176343586
  16. C. R. Rao: Estimation of parameters in a linear model. Ann. Statist. 4 (1976), 1023-1037.   DOI:10.1214/aos/1176343639
  17. C. R. Rao: Estimation in linear models with mixed effects: a unified theory. In: Proc. Second International Tampere Conference in Statistics (T. Pukkila and S. Puntanen, eds.), Dept. of Mathematical Sciences, Univ. of Tampere, Tampere 1987, pp. 73-98.   CrossRef
  18. G. K. Robinson: That BLUP is a good thing-the estimation of random effects. Statist. Sci. 6 (1991), 15-51.   DOI:10.1214/ss/1177011933
  19. W. Shiqing, M. Ying and F. Zhijun: Integral expression form of admissible linear estimators of effects in linear mixed models. In: Proc. 2010 International Conference on Computing, Control and Industrial Engineering, IEEE, Wuhan 2010, pp. 56-60.   DOI:10.1109/ccie.2010.133
  20. C. Stępniak: On admissible estimators in a linear model. Biometrical J. 26 (1984), 815-816.   DOI:10.1002/bimj.4710260725
  21. C. Stępniak: A complete class for linear estimation in a general linear model. Ann. Inst. Statist. Math. A 39 (1987), 563-573.   DOI:10.1007/bf02491490
  22. C. Stępniak: Admissible invariant esimators in a linear model. Kybernetika 50 (2014), 310-321.   DOI:10.14736/kyb-2014-3-0310
  23. E. Synówka-Bejenka and S. Zontek: A characterization of admissible linear estimators of fixed and random effects in linear models. Metrika 68 (2008), 157-172.   DOI:10.1007/s00184-007-0149-0
  24. Y. Tian: A new derivation of BLUPs under random-effects model. Metrika 78 (2015), 905-918.   DOI:10.1007/s00184-015-0533-0
  25. S. Zontek: On characterization of linear admissible estimators: an extension of a result due to C. R. Rao. J. Multivariate Anal. 23 (1987), 1-12.   DOI:10.1016/0047-259x(87)90174-6
  26. S. Zontek: Admissibility of limits of the unique locally best linear estimators with application to variance components models. Probab. Math. Statist. 9 (1988), 29-44.   CrossRef