Kybernetika 52 no. 4, 558-574, 2016

Task criticalness potential: A multiple criteria approach to project management

Helena Brožová, Jan Bartoška, Tomáš Šubrt and Jan RydvalDOI: 10.14736/kyb-2016-4-0558

Abstract:

The paper proposes the method evaluating tasks criticalness potential, which has been analysed by various project management tools. The criticalness potential of tasks, as opposed to a simple differentiation of tasks to critical and non-critical using the CPM method, considers not only time, but also resource, cost and topological aspects of a project schedule. In the paper, the tasks criticalness potential is defined applying task criticalness indicators which are further used as input for three various multiple criteria decision models. These models enable taking into account the principal project success criteria, i. e. time, resources and cost. The tasks criticalness potential cannot be determined using one indicator or one characteristic only. A selected multi-criteria approach based on task criticalness indicators differentiates between tasks more and less threatening to a project. This paper suggests different multiple criteria approaches to the quantification of task criticalness potential, compares them and discusses their advantages and disadvantages.

Keywords:

project management, task threat, criticalness potential, multiple criteria evaluation

Classification:

90B50, 90B99

References:

  1. A. T. de Almeida.: Multicriteria model for selection of preventive maintenance intervals. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 28 (2012), 585-593.   DOI:10.1002/qre.1415
  2. A. T. de Almeida, R. J. P. Ferreira and C. A. V. Cavalcante: A review of the use of multicriteria and multi-objective models in maintenance and reliability. IMA J. Management Math. 26 (2015), 249-271.   DOI:10.1093/imaman/dpv010
  3. M. Armstrong: A Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice. Tenth edition. Kogan Page, London 2006.   CrossRef
  4. J. Bartoška, H. Brožová, T. Šubrt and J. Rydval: Incorporating practitioners' expectations to project management teaching. In: Efficiency and Responsibility in Education 2013 (R. Kvasnička, ed.), Czech University of Life Sciences, Prague 2013, pp. 16-23.   CrossRef
  5. G. Bergatinos and E. Sanchez: How to distribute costs associated with a delayed project. Ann. Oper. Res. 109 (2002), 159-174.   DOI:10.1023/a:1016300218643
  6. J. Bowers: Identifying critical activities in stochastic resource constrained networks. Omega - Int. J. Management Sci. 24 (1996), 37-46.   DOI:10.1016/0305-0483(95)00046-1
  7. R. Branzei, G. Ferrari, V. Fragnelli and S. Tijs: Two approaches to the problem of sharing delay costs in joint projects. Ann. Oper. Res. 109 (2002), 357-372.   DOI:10.1023/a:1016372707256
  8. J. Castro, D. Gomez and J. Tejada: A project game for PERT networks. Oper. Res. Lett. 35 (2007), 791-798.   DOI:10.1016/j.orl.2007.01.003
  9. J. Castro, D. Gomez and J. Tejada: A polynomial rule for the problem of sharing delay costs in PERT networks. Comput. Oper. Res. 35 (2008), 2376-2387.   CrossRef
  10. S. Chanas and P. Zielinski: On the hardness of evaluating criticality of activities in a planar network with duration intervals. Oper. Res. Lett. 31 (2003), 53-59.   DOI:10.1016/s0167-6377(02)00174-8
  11. C. T. Chen and S. F. Huang: Applying fuzzy method for measuring criticality in project network. Inform. Sci. 177 (2007), 2448-2458.   DOI:10.1016/j.ins.2007.01.035
  12. J. G. Cho and B. J. Yum: An uncertainty importance measure of activities in PERT networks. Int. J. Project Management 35 (1997), 2737-2770.   DOI:10.1080/002075497194426
  13. D. Clegg and R. Barker: Case Method Fast-Track: A RAD Approach. Addison-Wesley 2004.   CrossRef
  14. T. Cooke-Davies: The "real" success factors on projects. Int. J. Project Management 20 (2002), 185-190.   DOI:10.1016/s0263-7863(01)00067-9
  15. S. Cruz, J. García and R. Herrerías: Stochastic models alternative to the classical PERT for the treatment of the risk: mesokurtic and of constant variance. Central Europ. J. Oper. Res. 7 (1999), 159-175.   CrossRef
  16. G. T. Doran: There's a S.M.A.R.T. way to write management's goals and objectives. Management Review 70 (1981), 35-36.   CrossRef
  17. A. Estévez-Fernández, P. Borm and H. Hamers: Project game. Int. J. Game Theory 36 (2007), 149-176.   CrossRef
  18. S. M. T. Fatemi Ghomi and E. Teimouri: Path critical index and activity critical index in PERT networks. Europ. J. Oper. Res. 141 (2002), 147-152.   DOI:10.1016/s0377-2217(01)00268-5
  19. D. Gong and J. E. Rowings: Calculation of safe float use in risk-analysis-oriented network scheduling. Int. J. Project Management 13 (1995), 187-194.   DOI:10.1016/0263-7863(94)00004-v
  20. F. Hartman and R. Ashrafi: Development of the SMART project planning framework Int. J. Project Management 22 (2004), 499-510.   DOI:10.1016/j.ijproman.2003.12.003
  21. D. Haughey: BOSCARD (Terms of Reference). Project Smart 2000-2011. http://www.projectsmart.co.uk/boscard.html. Accessed 12 January 2011.   CrossRef
  22. Ch. L. Hwang and K. Yoon: Multiple Attribute Decision Making. Springer Verlang, Berlin Heidelberg, New York 1981.   DOI:10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9
  23. M. Jakubík: Propensity to criticalness in the PERT method, the expectation of time and distance of activities from project beginning. In: Proc. 29th International Conference on Mathematical Methods in Economics 2011 (J. Jablonsky ed.), Univ. Econom., Fac. Informat. and Stat., Prague 2011.   CrossRef
  24. J. E. Kelley Jr.: Critical-path planning and scheduling: Mathematical basis. Oper. Res. 9 (1961), 296-320.   DOI:10.1287/opre.9.3.296
  25. T. Lenahan: Turnaround, Shutdown and Outage Management: Effective Planning and Step-by-Step Execution of Planned Maintenance Operations. Butterworth-Heinemann, An imprint of Elsevier, 2006.   CrossRef
  26. M. Madadi and H. Iranmanesh: A management oriented approach to reduce a project duration and its risk (variability). Europ. J. Oper. Res. 219 (2012), 751-761.   DOI:10.1016/j.ejor.2012.01.006
  27. D. G. Malcolm, J. R. Roseboom, C. E. Clark and W. Fazar: Application of a technique for research and development program evaluation. Oper. Res. 7 (1959), 646-669.   DOI:10.1287/opre.7.5.646
  28. J. J. Martin: Distribution of the time through a directed, acyclic network. Oper. Res. 13 (1965), 46-66.   DOI:10.1287/opre.13.1.46
  29. J. R. San Cristóbal Mateo: Management Science, Operations Research and Project Management - Modelling, Evaluation, Scheduling, Monitoring. Gower Publishing 2015.   CrossRef
  30. C. M. M. Mota and A. T. de Almeida: A multicriteria decision model for assigning priority classes to activities in project management. Ann. Oper. Res. 199 (2011), 361-372.   DOI:10.1007/s10479-011-0853-z
  31. B. Roy: The outranking approach and the foundations of ELECTRE methods. Theory and Decision31 (1991), 49-73.   DOI:10.1007/bf00134132
  32. B. Roy and W. Mousseau: A theoretical framework for analysing the notion of relative importance of criteria. J. Multi-criteria Decision Analysis 5 (1996), 145-149.   DOI:10.1002/(sici)1099-1360(199606)5:2<145::aid-mcda99>3.0.co;2-5
  33. T. L. Saaty: Relative Measurement and its generalization in decision making: why pairwise comparisons are central in mathematics for the measurement of intangible factors: The analytic hierarchy/network process. Rev. R. Acad. Cien. Serie A. Mat. 102 (2008), 251-318.   DOI:10.1007/bf03191825
  34. M. Smith and J. Erwin.: Role \& Responsibility Charting (RACI). Project Management Forum 2005.   CrossRef
  35. C. Tofallis: Add or multiply? A tutorial on ranking and choosing with multiple criteria. A Tutorial on Ranking and Choosing with Multiple Criteria. INFORMS Transactions on Education 14 (2014), 109-119.   DOI:10.1287/ited.2013.0124
  36. P. Weaver: A brief history of scheduling - Back to the future. myPrimavera konference, Australia 2006.   CrossRef
  37. R. M. Wideman: Project and Program Risk Management. Project Management Institute 1992.   CrossRef
  38. T. M. Williams: Criticality in stochastic networks. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 43 (1992), 353-357.   DOI:10.1038/sj/jors/0430407
  39. S. H. Yakhchali: A path enumeration approach for the analysis of critical activities in fuzzy networks. Inform. Sci. 204 (2012), 23-35.   DOI:10.1016/j.ins.2012.01.025
  40. G. Yemm: Essential Guide to Leading Your Team: How to Set Goals, Measure Performance and Reward Talent. Pearson Education, Harlow 2013.   CrossRef