Kybernetika 54 no. 2, 363-374, 2018

Stationarity and invertibility of a dynamic correlation matrix

Michael McAleerDOI: 10.14736/kyb-2018-2-0363

Abstract:

One of the most widely-used multivariate conditional volatility models is the dynamic conditional correlation (or DCC) specification. However, the underlying stochastic process to derive DCC has not yet been established, which has made problematic the derivation of asymptotic properties of the Quasi-Maximum Likelihood Estimators (QMLE). To date, the statistical properties of the QMLE of the DCC parameters have purportedly been derived under highly restrictive and unverifiable regularity conditions. The paper shows that the DCC model can be obtained from a vector random coefficient moving average process, and derives the stationarity and invertibility conditions of the DCC model. The derivation of DCC from a vector random coefficient moving average process raises three important issues, as follows: (i) demonstrates that DCC is, in fact, a dynamic conditional covariance model of the returns shocks rather than a dynamic conditional correlation model; (ii) provides the motivation, which is presently missing, for standardization of the conditional covariance model to obtain the conditional correlation model; and (iii) shows that the appropriate ARCH or GARCH model for DCC is based on the standardized shocks rather than the returns shocks. The derivation of the regularity conditions, especially stationarity and invertibility, may subsequently lead to a solid statistical foundation for the estimates of the DCC parameters. Several new results are also derived for univariate models, including a novel conditional volatility model expressed in terms of standardized shocks rather than returns shocks, as well as the associated stationarity and invertibility conditions.

Keywords:

invertibility, asymptotic properties, dynamic conditional correlation, dynamic conditional covariance, vector random coefficient moving average, stationarity

Classification:

C22, C52, C58, G32

References:

  1. G. P. Aielli: Dynamic conditional correlations: On properties and estimation. J. Business Econom. Statist. 31 (2013), 282-299.   DOI:10.1080/07350015.2013.771027
  2. T. Amemiya: Advanced Econometrics. Harvard University Press, Cambridge 1985.   CrossRef
  3. Y. Baba, R. F. Engle, D. Kraft and K. F. Kroner: Multivariate simultaneous generalized ARCH. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Economics, University of California, San Diego 1985, (the published version is given in Engle and Kroner [16]).   CrossRef
  4. T. Bollerslev: Generalised autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity. J. Econometr. 31 (1986), 307-327.   DOI:10.1016/0304-4076(86)90063-1
  5. M. Caporin and M. McAleer: Ten things you should know about the dynamic conditional correlation representation. Econometrics 1 (2013), 1, 115-126.   DOI:10.3390/econometrics1010115
  6. C.-L. Chang and M. McAleer: A simple test for causality in volatility. Econometrics 5 (2017), 1, 5 pp.   DOI:10.3390/econometrics5010015
  7. C.-L. Chang, M. McAleer and R. Tansuchat: Modelling conditional correlations for risk diversification in crude oil markets. J. Energy Markets 2 (2009/10), 4, 1-23.   DOI:10.2139/ssrn.1401331
  8. C.-L. Chang, M. McAleer and R. Tansuchat: Analyzing and forecasting volatility spillovers, asymmetries and hedging in major oil markets. Energy Economics 32 (2010), 1445-1455.   DOI:10.1016/j.eneco.2010.04.014
  9. C.-L. Chang, M. McAleer and R. Tansuchat: Crude oil hedging strategies using dynamic multivariate GARCH. Energy Economics 33 (2011), 5, 912-923.   DOI:10.1016/j.eneco.2011.01.009
  10. C.-L. Chang, M. McAleer and R. Tansuchat: Conditional correlations and volatility spillovers between crude oil and stock index returns. North Amer. J. Econom. Finance 25 (2013), 116-138.   DOI:10.1016/j.najef.2012.06.002
  11. C.-L. Chang, M. McAleer and Y.-A. Wang: Modelling volatility spillovers for bio-ethanol, sugarcane and corn spot and futures prices. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 81 (2018), 1, 1002-1018.   DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2017.07.024
  12. C.-L. Chang, M. McAleer and G. D. Zuo: Volatility spillovers and causality of carbon emissions, oil and coal spot and futures for the EU and USA. Sustainability 9 (2017), 10, p. 1789, 1-22.   DOI:10.3390/su9101789
  13. J.-C. Duan: Augmented GARCH$(p,q)$ process and its diffusion limit. J. Econometrics 79 (1997), 97-127.   DOI:10.1016/s0304-4076(97)00009-2
  14. R. F. Engle: Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation. Econometrica 50 (1982), 987-1007.   DOI:10.2307/1912773
  15. R. F. Engle: Dynamic conditional correlation: A simple class of multivariate generalized autoregressive conditional hereoskedasticity models. J. Business Econom. Statist. 20 (2002), 339-350.   CrossRef
  16. R. F. Engle and K. F. Kroner: Multivariate simultaneous generalized ARCH. Econometr. Theory 11 (1995), 122-150.   DOI:10.1017/s0266466600009063
  17. L. Hentschel: All in the family: Nesting symmetric and asymmetric GARCH models. J. Financial Economics 39 (1995), 71-104.   DOI:10.1016/0304-405x(94)00821-h
  18. T. Jeantheau: Strong consistency of estimators for multivariate ARCH models. Econometr. Theory 14 (1998), 70-86.   DOI:10.1017/s0266466698141038
  19. S. Ling and M. McAleer: Asymptotic theory for a vector ARMA-GARCH model. Econometr. Theory 19 (2003), 280-310.   DOI:10.1017/S0266466603192092
  20. T. Marek: On invertibility of a random coefficient moving average model. Kybernetika 41 (2005), 01, 743-756.   CrossRef
  21. M. McAleer, F. Chan, S. Hoti and O. Lieberman: Generalized autoregressive conditional correlation. Econometr. Theory 24 (2008), 6, 1554-1583.   DOI:10.1017/s0266466608080614
  22. R. S. Tsay: Conditional heteroscedastic time series models. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 82 (1987), 590-604.   DOI:10.2307/2289470
  23. Y. K. Tse and A. K. C. Tsui: A multivariate GARCH model with time-varying correlations. J. Business Econom. Statist. 20 (2002), 351-362.   DOI:10.1198/073500102288618496